Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gina Dimaggio's avatar

We know with certainty that attempts at weather “control” is real. Chemical adulteration of our atmosphere is real. Ice Nucleation is real. How do you get “freeze” warnings in areas that barely fall below 40degrees for days and nights on end. How do you get “weather” people predicting rain that never occurs? The assault on our atmosphere is not subtle. It is real and it happens with alarming frequency which brings me to another crime against humanity .. frequencies that pummel the aerosolized clouds after the spraying has occurred. And we must realize, as climate hackers such as David Keith admit, that haven’t a clue as to affects of their playing God with the climate …

Expand full comment
Hugh Boone's avatar

In my view, the claims of unpredictability and incompetence are indeed a smokescreen, a form of Drunken-style kung fu. People fall for it because it makes them feel more secure, even if it’s falsely sensed. Better to believe we are ruled by idiots rather than high-functioning psychopaths. But the former are simply useful to the latter.

Cloud seeding has always worked. Mount Greylock in Massachusetts in 1946 , Schaefer created the first human-made snowstorm. It worked, in the EAST of the US.

Looking over Project Cirrus run by GE, the Military and the Weather Bureau, you can see it WAS a success. They measurably increased precipitation – they did what it says on the can – job done.

It was only shut down after Langmuir’s hurricane slammed into Georgia, a low-yankee trick. He claimed success, the hurricane’s direction was indeed modified, which is disconcerting as he was supposed to be in the business of mitigation. Indeed, it is difficult to see how fuelling a hurricane can reduce its capacity for destruction. Whatever the case, the fellows in the business of litigation were not so pleased. GE’s lawyers told him not to boast about his achievement before the statute of limitations ran out. We can see the signs here of company and government officials attempting to play down the effects of cloud seeding, not because it doesn’t work but because of the consequences of a public awareness of official involvement with such activities.

They are merely covering their arses with this “uncertainty” bollocks.

Consider this. All the cloud seeding in the west of the US is actually INTENDED to cause the drought,

Cloud seeding is not snake oil. The problem is that it robs Peter to pay Paul.

If you force it to rain somewhere, somewhere else is not going to get that rain – drought.

Likewise, if you prevent it from raining somewhere, somewhere else is going to get too much rain – flooding.

The two opposing types of Cloud Seeding involve:

• Dispersing optimum numbers of ice nuclei for the purposes of enhancing precipitation.

• Over-seeding – dispersing too many ice nuclei for the purposes of reducing precipitation.

Predictability and ethics are the real limitations. Attempts to play down the effectiveness of cloud seeding are really a cynical means of avoiding legal liability for drought and floods. Obviously, this double-edged sword has military applications which are likely to remain under the radar.

I put it to you that there is a grand over-seeding operation in the western US which locks up the moisture and dumps it in the east. Distorted precipitation patterns over the last couple of decades bear this out, and it’s not climate change, rather changed climate.

And, sorry Jim, but commercial aircraft most certainly also play a role in this. Intentional “inadvertent” emission of artificial ice nuclei in the form of combustion ash on a massive scale is going to find its way down to those levels where overt cloud seeding occurs, locking up the moisture, and delaying precipitation in the cloud systems which move from west to east naturally.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts